Optuma VS TradingView: Which Trading Software is the Best?

by | Trading Software | 0 comments

Optuma vs trading view - banner

Which Backtesting Software is Best for Systematic Traders?

Optuma VS TradingView: Comparing Backtesting Software for Systematic Trading

If you’re a serious trader looking for the best backtesting software, choosing between Optuma and TradingView can feel like a maze. While both platforms offer strong visual tools and data access, only one is better suited to systematic traders who want to build rules-based strategies, simulate portfolios, and eliminate discretionary guesswork.

Optuma is more powerful for serious system traders needing advanced backtesting and professional market analysis tools. TradingView shines for ease of use, charting, and community-driven exploration but lacks portfolio-level testing.

Let’s break it down feature by feature.

Optuma VS TradingView at a Glance:

Short on time? Here’s how Optuma VS TradingView  compare side by side.

Feature

Optuma

TradingView

Platform Type

Windows desktop + cloud (via Parallels)

Web-based + desktop (Mac & PC)

Year Established

1996

2011

Cost

From ~$810/year (Trader)

Freemium; paid plans from ~$155/year

Backtesting

Multi-code, multi-symbol

Single asset, no portfolio simulation

Programming

Optuma Scripting Language (OSL)

Pine Script (v4/v5)

Market Access

ASX, US, TSX, FX, Futures, more

Most global markets (delayed & real-time)

Execution

Supports Interactive Brokers

Multiple broker integrations

Strategy Optimization

Monte Carlo, Walk Forward

Basic parameter sweeps only

Portfolio Simulation

Advanced

Not supported

Support

Phone, email, manuals, professional docs

Chat, forums, large community

Platform Overview, Cost & Compatibility

Optuma is a professional-grade platform originally built for institutional research desks. It’s Windows-based but can run on Mac using Parallels. It offers multiple pricing tiers based on your data and module needs. While the cost is higher, you’re paying for robust analytical depth.

TradingView is browser-based and user-friendly. It runs on any device and has free access to many features, with optional paid plans unlocking more indicators, chart layouts, and data speeds. It’s simple to use, which makes it appealing to casual traders – but limited for systematic development.

Verdict: If you’re focused on system design and portfolio-level testing, Optuma is worth the investment. TradingView is ideal for quick chart reviews and learning market structure.

Optuma Main View:

Optuma - main view

TradingView Main View:

Tradingview - main view

Market Access & Data Support in Optuma VS TradingView

Optuma connects to a wide array of data sources: equities, futures, forex, indices, and even point-and-figure charts. It offers institutional-quality data feeds, customizable to what markets you trade.

TradingView gives broad access to global markets including crypto, stocks, and forex. You can also connect real-time data from supported brokers.

However, TradingView’s data focus is chart-first. Optuma is data-first – it allows deeper control over data conditioning, filtering, and bar-by-bar accuracy needed for reliable backtesting.

Verdict: For data accuracy, Optuma wins. For general access and convenience, TradingView is easier.

Optuma Backtesting Interface:

Optuma - backtesting interface

TradingView Backtesting Interface:

Tradingview - backtesting interface

Building & Customizing Trading Strategies

In Optuma, you build strategies using the Optuma Scripting Language (OSL). It’s proprietary, with logic-based syntax that allows building and combining trading signals across multiple markets and timeframes.

TradingView uses Pine Script. It’s popular and simple to learn, great for building single-asset indicators or alerts. However, Pine lacks the scope to model strategies across portfolios or simulate capital usage.

Systematic traders need to consider capital allocation, correlation, and position sizing – features Optuma handles but TradingView does not.

Verdict: Optuma is better suited for traders building structured trading systems. TradingView is a good tool to test individual ideas visually.

Check Out: Trading System Development 

Optuma Code Editor:

Optuma - code editor script manager

TradingView Code Editor:

Tradingview code editor

Backtesting Performance, Speed & Realism

This is where the rubber meets the road.

Optuma supports:

  • Multi-symbol backtesting
  • Portfolio-level testing
  • Capital allocation logic
  • Transaction cost modeling
  • Equity curve tracking per strategy

TradingView supports:

  • Indicator and signal testing on a single instrument
  • No portfolio simulation
  • No strategy-level capital or drawdown modeling

If you want to test a trend-following system on the ASX and US stocks simultaneously, or run a mean reversion system on the NASDAQ with capital rules, TradingView can’t do it. Optuma can.

Verdict: No contest. Optuma is far more powerful for backtesting. If your goal is confidence in your edge, backtest in Optuma – or better yet, use RealTest for faster and more realistic portfolio testing.

Check out: Backtesting | Drawdown

Optuma Backtest Report:

Optuma - backtest report

TradingView Backtest Report:

Tradingview backtest report

Strategy Optimization & Stress Testing Tools

Optuma includes modules for:

  • Monte Carlo analysis
  • Parameter variation
  • Walk-forward analysis
  • Robustness reporting

These are essential for filtering out curve-fit strategies that only work on historical quirks. While not as advanced as RealTest or dedicated tools like QuantAnalyzer, it’s far better than nothing.

TradingView’s optimization is limited to running multiple versions of a script with different variables – more manual, no robustness metrics, no walk-forward testing.

Verdict: Optuma is the better choice for serious traders wanting confidence in their results. TradingView is limited to basic tweaking.

Charting Features, Signal Exploration & Live Execution

TradingView wins on ease of use and chart visuals. It’s fast, clean, and packed with community indicators. Scanning is intuitive and code-free. Execution is also seamless for many brokers, especially in crypto and forex.

Optuma is more advanced but has a steeper learning curve. Its scanning capabilities are powerful and tailored for institutional-style workflows. Execution is possible via Interactive Brokers, but not Optuma’s strength.

Verdict: For charts and simplicity, TradingView is more accessible. For advanced scanning and scripting, Optuma is superior.

Check Out Order Types | Automated Trading Systems

Optuma Automation Set Up:

Optuma - automation set up automatic grouping

TradingView Automation Set Up:

Tradingview automation set up

Support, Documentation & Learning Resources

TradingView’s community support is massive. You’ll find thousands of Pine Script examples and video tutorials.

Optuma’s documentation is comprehensive but more technical. Their email and phone support are helpful, and training is geared toward professional users.

Still, RealTest sets the gold standard here with lean, clear, and modern documentation that traders can follow without guessing.

Verdict: TradingView has the most approachable learning curve. Optuma is more complex, but has the depth when you’re ready for it.

Optuma Forum Front Page is illustrated down below:

Optuma - forum front page

TradingView Community Ideas Front Page is illustrated down below:

Tradingview blog

Optuma VS TradingView: Which One Should You Use?

If your priority is charting, signal alerts, and simple indicator tweaking – TradingView is the better match. It’s fast, easy to use, and accessible.

But if you want to build, test, and run systematic strategies with proper rules, capital allocation, and realism – Optuma is clearly the stronger trading software.

Just remember: both are missing key strengths RealTest offers – particularly speed, ease of scripting, and fully realistic portfolio backtesting.

Our Recommendation

If you’re aiming to trade professionally or build confidence in your strategy, use RealTest as your primary backtesting software. You can layer in Optuma for charting and data visualizations or TradingView for quick scans and signal alerts.

Systematic trading success comes from clarity, realism, and alignment – not just pretty charts. Don’t fall into the trap of endless chart-watching.

Want The Rest of the Puzzle?

Backtesting software is just one piece. The real transformation happens when you align your tools, your systems, and your psychology with your goals.

If you’re tired of chasing tips and want to build wealth systematically, the next step is clear: The Trader Success System.

Inside, you’ll discover:

Join The Trader Success System Now

Trading and Backtesting Software Review List

author avatar
Adrian Reid
See Full Bio

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *