Which Backtesting Software is Best for Systematic Traders?

TradingView VS Metatrader 4: Which Trading Software is the Best? - Table of Contents

TradingView VS MetaTrader 4: Comparing Backtesting Software for Systematic Trading

If your primary goal is to build, test, and trade rule-based systems with confidence and speed, neither TradingView nor MetaTrader 4 is ideal as your main backtesting software. That title belongs to RealTest. However, both TradingView and MT4 offer specific features that can still serve certain traders well, especially for charting and execution. Here’s how they compare side-by-side.

TradingView VS MetaTrader 4 at a Glance:

Short on time? Here’s how TradingView VS MetaTrader 4 compare side by side.

Feature	TradingView	MetaTrader 4
Year Established	2011	2005
Operating System	Web + Windows/Mac app	Windows only
Broker Integration	Partial, via connected accounts	Full, broker-delivered platform
Strategy Language	Pine Script v5	MQL4 (more complex, but powerful)
Backtesting Support	Basic, limited realism	Strategy tester with limitations
Platform Cost	Freemium w/ upgrades	Free through brokers
Data Access	Wide multi-asset coverage	Broker-dependent
Ease of Use	Intuitive for charting and scripting	Steeper learning curve

Platform Overview, Cost & Compatibility

TradingView is a browser-based platform with additional desktop apps for Mac and Windows. It’s fast, responsive, and runs without installation. That’s a big plus for traders who use multiple devices. However, full backtesting capabilities require a paid plan.

MetaTrader 4 is a Windows-only desktop application (unless run through a virtual machine on Mac). It’s been around since 2005 and is widely used by forex traders.

TradingView Main View:

MetaTrader 4 Main View:

Market Access & Data Support in TradingView VS MetaTrader 4

TradingView connects to a wide range of markets (stocks, forex, crypto, future) and offers extensive historical data on-demand. But backtestable data is limited to what your script requests, and you don’t get full portfolio-level simulation.

MT4 relies entirely on your broker for data. You don’t get clean historical datasets or full market depth unless your broker provides them.

TradingView Backtesting Interface:

MetaTrader 4 Backtesting Interface:

Building & Customizing Trading Strategies

TradingView uses Pine Script. It’s accessible and beginner-friendly, but limited in flexibility. You can build simple strategies and backtest them bar-by-bar on the chart. However, there’s no support for portfolio-level testing or multi-symbol strategies.

MetaTrader 4 uses MQL4, a much more powerful and complex scripting language. It supports indicators, scripts, and automated Expert Advisors (EAs), but has a steeper learning curve. For programmers, it offers more flexibility than Pine Script.

If you’re just starting with trading system development, TradingView is easier to learn. But MT4 offers more depth, at the cost of complexity.

Check Out: Trading System Development

TradingView Code Editor:

MetaTrader 4 Code Editor:

Backtesting Performance, Speed & Realism

This is where both platforms fall short for serious system traders.

TradingView does not support true portfolio backtesting. You can test one instrument at a time, but there’s no simulation of position sizing, slippage, or capital allocation across multiple symbols. Speed is limited by the platform’s visual interface.

MT4 includes a built-in Strategy Tester. It allows for visual and non-visual backtesting of EAs, but only on one symbol at a time. There are workarounds with multi-symbol EAs, but they’re not user-friendly. Execution realism (e.g. order fills, delays) is minimal unless heavily customized.

If backtesting realism, drawdown, and simulation accuracy matter to you, and they should, use RealTest instead. It’s faster, more realistic, and supports full portfolio-level simulation.

Check out: Backtesting | Drawdown

TradingView Backtest Report:

MetaTrader 4 Backtest Report:

Strategy Optimization & Stress Testing Tools

TradingView has no built-in optimization. You need to manually change parameters and rerun the script. This makes robustness testing tedious and error-prone.

MetaTrader 4 includes parameter optimization with multiple modes and custom criteria. However, it’s notorious for curve fitting. It also lacks walk-forward analysis and other modern robustness tools.

If your aim is to perform trading system optimization that’s fast, stable, and repeatable, MT4 is better than TradingView, but still second-rate compared to professional tools like RealTest or Amibroker.

Charting Features, Signal Exploration & Live Execution

TradingView shines here. It offers clean, fast charts with hundreds of built-in indicators and overlays. The scanner is powerful and customizable. Execution integration is limited to certain brokers, but improving.

MT4 offers basic charting and a clunky scanner (Market Watch). Execution is integrated and typically faster, but users say the experience is dated, it feels like software from 2005, because it is.

If you want to visually explore the market and spot ideas, TradingView wins hands down. If you want fast execution in forex, MT4 may still be useful.

Check Out Order Types | Automated Trading Systems

TradingView Automation Set Up:

MetaTrader 4 Automation Set Up:

Support, Documentation & Learning Resources

TradingView has modern documentation and a vast public script library. It’s easy to find examples and learn Pine Script. Community support is strong, especially for indicator development.

MetaTrader 4 has fragmented documentation. Most support comes from third-party forums, not official channels. The MetaEditor tool helps with code building, but it’s not beginner-friendly.

Compared to either, RealTest offers clear, modern documentation with a focus on backtesting speed and system clarity, a major benefit for traders building a portfolio of systems.

TradingView Community Ideas Front Page is illustrated down below:

MetaTrader 4 Forum Front Page is illustrated down below:

TradingView VS MetaTrader 4: Which One Should You Use?

If your focus is ease of use, modern charting, and simple strategy testing, TradingView offers a better user experience.

If you want automation, broker execution, and can handle complex scripting, MetaTrader 4 is more flexible.

But for serious system traders focused on consistent profits, neither is the best core backtesting tool.

Our Recommendation

Use TradingView for market visualization, scanning, and early-stage scripting.

Use MetaTrader 4 only if you’re committed to forex trading with automated EAs and are comfortable coding in MQL4.

But for true systematic trading success (where speed, realism, and multi-strategy simulation matter) use RealTest. It’s purpose-built for traders who want to trade professionally with consistency and confidence.

Want The Rest of the Puzzle?

Backtesting software is just one piece. The real transformation happens when you align your tools, your systems, and your psychology with your goals.

If you’re tired of chasing tips and want to build wealth systematically, the next step is clear: The Trader Success System.

Inside, you’ll discover:

Proven trading systems
A step-by-step backtesting framework
Position sizing tools
Automation strategies that let you trade in 30 minutes or less

Join The Trader Success System Now

Trading and Backtesting Software Review List

Check our our Trading and backtesting software review hub

Adrian Reid Founder and CEO

Adrian is a full-time private trader based in Australia and also the Founder and Trading Coach at Enlightened Stock Trading, which focuses on educating and supporting traders on their journey to profitable systems trading. Following his successful adoption of systematic trading which generated him hundreds of thousands of dollars a year using just 30 minutes a day to manage his system trading workflow, Adrian made the easy decision to leave his professional work in the corporate world in 2012. Adrian trades long/short across US, Australian and international stock markets and the cryptocurrency markets. His trading systems are now fully automated and have consistently outperformed international share markets with dramatically reduced risk over the past 20+ years. Adrian focuses on building portfolios of profitable, stable and robust long term trading systems to beat market returns with high risk adjusted returns. Adrian teaches traders from all over the world how to get profitable, confident and consistent by trading systematically and backtesting their own trading systems. He helps profitable traders grow and smooth returns by implementing a portfolio of trading systems to make money from different markets and market conditions.

See Full Bio

Backtesting Trading Systems Trading Strategy Risk Management For Traders Position Sizing Stop Loss Trend Trading Mean Reversion Technical Analysis Trading Indicators Amibroker Trading Plans Order Types Trading Calculators Trading Books Trading Mistakes Trading Goals Trading Psychology Trading System Optimization Stock Trading Cryptocurrency Trading

TradingView VS Metatrader 4: Which Trading Software is the Best?