Tradingview vs metatrader 5 - banner

TradingView VS MetaTrader 5: Comparing Backtesting Software for Systematic Trading

For traders serious about building consistency and eliminating emotion, neither TradingView nor MetaTrader 5 (MT5) is ideal as a core backtesting software. TradingView shines in charting and ease of access, while MT5 is better suited for automated execution and broker integration. However, both fall short in portfolio-level systematic trading and advanced backtesting realism.

If you want speed, realism, and systematic simplicity, RealTest is the preferred tool. But if you’re early in your journey or prioritise visual analysis, keep reading to see where each tool fits best.

TradingView VS MetaTrader 5 at a Glance:

Short on time? Here’s how TradingView VS MetaTrader 5 compare side by side.

Feature

TradingView

MetaTrader 5 (MT5)

Platform Type

Web-based, desktop, mobile

Primarily desktop (Windows), mobile, web

Programming Language

Pine Script

MQL5 (powerful but more complex)

Integrated Brokerage

Many supported via API

Deep broker integration (mainly Forex/CFDs)

Backtesting Engine

Limited, single-symbol, non-portfolio

Supports single-system backtesting with EAs

Strategy Automation

Limited, via 3rd party

Built-in for supported brokers

Charting & Visual Tools

Market-leading

Adequate, not as modern

Cost

Freemium (limited free, paid tiers available)

Free (via broker)

Learning Curve

Moderate

Steep

Suitability for Systematic Trading

Low-to-Medium

Medium

Platform Overview, Cost & Compatibility

TradingView is cloud-based and runs on nearly any device. You can use it on Windows, Mac, or even directly in a browser. There’s also a mobile app. The platform has both free and premium tiers, with backtesting and alerts improving at higher levels.

MetaTrader 5, on the other hand, is a downloadable desktop application. It’s free through most brokers but best suited to Windows. Mac users can run MT5 using Parallels or a virtual machine, but Wine is not recommended due to instability.

If simplicity and multi-device access are important, TradingView wins here. If you’re already trading through a supported broker and need automation, MT5 might fit better.

TradingView Main View:

Tradingview - main view

MetaTrader 5 Main View:

Metatrader-5 - main view

Market Access & Data Support in TradingView VS MetaTrader 5

TradingView supports real-time data feeds from a wide range of global exchanges (stocks, crypto, forex). You can connect your broker, though live trading access depends on broker compatibility and your subscription tier.

MT5 primarily targets Forex and CFD traders, with access depending entirely on your broker. Some brokers offer stock CFDs or limited exchange connectivity, but it’s not consistent across providers.

So if you’re trading equities systematically with reliable end-of-day data, neither platform is ideal. But for retail forex traders seeking live automation, MT5 has the edge.

TradingView Backtesting Interface:

Tradingview - backtesting interface

MetaTrader 5 Backtesting Interface:

Metatrader-5 - backtesting interface

Building & Customizing Trading Strategies

TradingView uses Pine Script, a purpose-built language for indicators and simple strategies. It’s readable but limited in terms of portfolio-level logic. Good for developing one-off entry conditions or indicators.

MT5 uses MQL5, a powerful, compiled language for building Expert Advisors (EAs). It’s capable of sophisticated logic but much harder to learn and debug. Great if you’re a programmer, but not beginner-friendly.

Neither platform supports full portfolio-level trading system development, which is crucial for long-term success and proper diversification.

    Check Out: Trading System Development 

    TradingView Code Editor:

    Tradingview code editor

    MetaTrader 5 Code Editor:

    Metatrader-5 - code editor

    Backtesting Performance, Speed & Realism

    TradingView’s backtester is basic. It operates on a single symbol and doesn’t handle portfolio rules or real-world constraints like position sizing, slippage, or margin properly. It’s fine for quick tests but dangerous if used for system validation.

    MT5 offers more depth, including custom position sizing and slippage settings, but it also runs single-system tests. Portfolio-level simulation isn’t supported natively, which limits its use for traders seeking realistic multi-strategy testing.

    Both are inferior to RealTest, which supports fast, realistic portfolio backtesting with clear and actionable outputs.

    Check out: Backtesting | Drawdown

    TradingView Backtest Report:

    Tradingview backtest report

    MetaTrader 5 Backtest Report:

    Metatrader-5 - backtest report

    Strategy Optimization & Stress Testing Tools

    TradingView has no native optimization tools. Any tuning of parameters must be done manually through trial and error.

    MT5 includes a built-in optimizer and genetic algorithm support, making it more robust for exploring strategy parameters. However, it’s easy to fall into curve fitting traps if you don’t understand proper robustness testing techniques.

    Neither platform helps you deeply assess stability over time or test across market conditions. RealTest or Amibroker is much more suited for this.

    MetaTrader 5 Genetic Optimization:

    Meta trader 5 - genetic optimization

    Charting Features, Signal Exploration & Live Execution

    TradingView leads the industry in charting and scanning. It offers fast, smooth charts, multi-timeframe analysis, and custom indicators. It’s a powerful tool for visualising market behaviour or identifying setups visually.

    MT5’s charting is functional but dated. Scanning capabilities depend on custom coding via MQL5 or third-party tools. Automation and execution, however, are tightly integrated if your broker supports it.

    For system development, execution matters, but scanning and visual clarity can speed up your process. Use TradingView for visuals, MT5 for broker automation, and RealTest for the core strategy logic.

      Check Out Order Types | Automated Trading Systems

      TradingView Automation Set Up:

      Tradingview automation set up

      MetaTrader 5 Automation Set Up:

      Metatrader-5 - automation set up expert advisor

      Support, Documentation & Learning Resources

      TradingView has a large community and decent documentation for Pine Script. It’s well-suited to self-learners and those seeking plug-and-play indicators.

      MT5 has extensive but scattered documentation. Learning MQL5 takes time and patience. Most help comes from forums and outdated tutorials, making it frustrating for newcomers.

      Compared to RealTest, which has clean, modern documentation and fast developer support, both platforms lag behind in clarity and accessibility.

      TradingView Community Ideas Front Page is illustrated down below:

      Tradingview blog

      MetaTrader 5 Forum Front Page is illustrated down below:

      Metatrader-5 - forum front page

      TradingView VS MetaTrader 5: Which One Should You Use?

      If you want great charts, quick prototyping, and a visual playground for ideas, TradingView delivers. But it’s not a serious backtesting software platform.

      If you’re trading live via a Forex broker and want automation with tighter broker integration, MetaTrader 5 wins.

      But if your goal is systematic trading with accuracy, confidence, and efficiency… you’ll need to look beyond both.

      Want The Rest of the Puzzle?

      Backtesting software is just one piece. The real transformation happens when you align your tools, your systems, and your psychology with your goals.

      If you’re tired of chasing tips and want to build wealth systematically, the next step is clear: The Trader Success System.

      Inside, you’ll discover:

      Trading and Backtesting Software Review List

      author avatar
      Adrian Reid Founder and CEO
      Adrian is a full-time private trader based in Australia and also the Founder and Trading Coach at Enlightened Stock Trading, which focuses on educating and supporting traders on their journey to profitable systems trading. Following his successful adoption of systematic trading which generated him hundreds of thousands of dollars a year using just 30 minutes a day to manage his system trading workflow, Adrian made the easy decision to leave his professional work in the corporate world in 2012. Adrian trades long/short across US, Australian and international stock markets and the cryptocurrency markets. His trading systems are now fully automated and have consistently outperformed international share markets with dramatically reduced risk over the past 20+ years. Adrian focuses on building portfolios of profitable, stable and robust long term trading systems to beat market returns with high risk adjusted returns. Adrian teaches traders from all over the world how to get profitable, confident and consistent by trading systematically and backtesting their own trading systems. He helps profitable traders grow and smooth returns by implementing a portfolio of trading systems to make money from different markets and market conditions.